The Argentine government was found “responsible” for the 1924 massacre of indigenous peoples.

Argentina formally recognized by the judiciary, Thursday, the “Responsible” Nearly a century ago, in an archive in Sacco (North), the state massacred more than 400 indigenous people. “True Inquiry” Recommended restructuring measures have not been released.

In this case, the court established it “On Saturday, July 19, 1924, a hundred policemen, genders and a few armed civilians, with the support of a plane, arrived at the barracks where a thousand people, including Gom and Mokoit families and agricultural workers, were on strike.” To protest their poor working conditions in the cotton fields. Armed groups opened fire for more than an hour “Between 400 and 500 people from the Gom and Mokoit ethnic groups died. (…)The wounded who could not escape were brutally killed. “Burial in mass graves, with excavations.

The so-called “Nabalbi massacre”, which for fifteen years had long been invisible, was revived, ordered by Judge Junilda Niremberger, who presided over the court. “Historical Correctional Measures”. In which, the publication of judgment Official newspaper, Adding murder to the school curriculum, broadcasting the investigation on public television, and continuing forensic research to exhume and hand over the remains of the victims. A monument has already been erected in 2020.

First time in Argentina

While the issue of economic compensation was not an issue or a demand during the debates, the verdict in theory would pave the way for civil proceedings. Nabalpi’s trial, of great symbolic value “without guilt,” is the first of its kind in the country, and marks an increased view of the crimes committed against the indigenous people during the rebuilding of Argentina as a nation. 19e Century and beyond.

See also  War in Ukraine: 11 killed in shooting at Russian military base
read more: The article is reserved for our subscribers In Argentina, more raw wounds of Sacco’s natives

Sacco Province (then non-existent), the Human Rights Secretariat (Government) and the Indigenous Saquino Institute were co-complainants in the proceedings. Judge Niremperger warned from the outset that the trial was over “Not seeking criminal responsibility, but to know the truth, to restore people’s memory, to heal wounds, to repair, to activate the memory and awareness of these human rights violations.”.

World with AFP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.